Statement: Students performed poorly after the syllabus was shortened.
Which judgement is valid?
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: A
Explanation
Valid Judgment:
The statement directly mentions that students' performance was poor even after the syllabus was shortened. This logically implies that shortening the syllabus failed to result in better learning outcomes.
Therefore, "Shorter syllabus did not improve learning" is the only valid judgment.
Hence, (A) is the correct option.