Read the following statements:
Statement I: The Act of 1793 followed the tradition of personal rule without bringing in any legal reforms.
Statement II: Judges were assigned to interpret laws rather than depend on the ruler's personal judgment.
Which of the above statements is/are true?
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: B
Explanation
The correct answer is option 2 i.e. Only 2 is true.
The Charter Act of 1793 was a significant step toward the Rule of Law, contradicting Statement I. It formally codified laws and regulations, shifting away from the personal whims of the ruler. According to Statement II, the Act empowered civil courts and judges to interpret these codified laws. This transition ensured that governance was based on written statutes rather than the subjective judgment of individual officials, marking the beginning of a modern judicial system in British India.