Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow by selecting the most appropriate option from the given alternatives.
The rise of genetic engineering has redefined what is scientifically possible, but not necessarily what is ethically acceptable. While gene editing offers hope in treating inherited diseases and improving crop resilience, it also raises profound moral questions. Should we edit genes to enhance intelligence or physical ability? Where do we draw the line between therapy and enhancement? These questions remain unsettled. Some argue that altering the human genome for non-medical reasons may lead to a new form of inequality – where the genetically modified have social advantages over others. Others fear unintended consequences: once a gene is changed, its effects may ripple through generations. Science often moves faster than legislation, leaving ethical frameworks lagging behind. True progress lies not in what we can do, but in what we choose to do responsibly. As with all powerful tools, genetic engineering demands caution, reflection, and a shared sense of human values.
What does the author suggest about using genes to enhance traits?
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: C
Explanation
Based on the provided passage, the correct option is “It risks creating inequality”.
Explanation
The author explicitly mentions that "altering the human genome for non-medical reasons may lead to a new form of inequality – where the genetically modified have social advantages over others". The passage frames gene enhancement (like intelligence or physical ability) as a source of potential moral and social conflict rather than a guaranteed benefit.