Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow by selecting the most appropriate option from the given alternatives.
The rise of genetic engineering has redefined what is scientifically possible, but not necessarily what is ethically acceptable. While gene editing offers hope in treating inherited diseases and improving crop resilience, it also raises profound moral questions. Should we edit genes to enhance intelligence or physical ability? Where do we draw the line between therapy and enhancement? These questions remain unsettled. Some argue that altering the human genome for non-medical reasons may lead to a new form of inequality – where the genetically modified have social advantages over others. Others fear unintended consequences: once a gene is changed, its effects may ripple through generations. Science often moves faster than legislation, leaving ethical frameworks lagging behind. True progress lies not in what we can do, but in what we choose to do responsibly. As with all powerful tools, genetic engineering demands caution, reflection, and a shared sense of human values.
What does the author imply about gene editing’s long-term impact?
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: B
Explanation
The correct option is “It can affect future generations”.
Explanation:
The author explicitly mentions the potential for changes to persist over time, stating: "once a gene is changed, its effects may ripple through generations." This implies that genetic modifications are not temporary or isolated to a single individual but can be inherited by offspring, leading to long-term biological consequences.