In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follows the given statements.
Statements:
I. Some namkeen are pizza.
II. No pizza is biscuit,
Conclusions:
I. No biscuit is namkeen.
II. No biscuit is pizza.
III. Some pizza are not biscuit.
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: B
Explanation
The correct answer is option 2 i.e. Both conclusions II and III follows.
Conclusion:
1. No biscuit is namkeen - Does not follow. (As there is no definite relation between biscuit and namkeen. so, it does not follow)
2. No biscuit is pizza - Follows. (As no pizza is biscuit so definitely no biscuit is pizza)
3. Some pizza are not biscuit - Follows. (As no pizza is biscuit so, its definite that some pizza are not biscuit.)