Here some problem or solution of the problem is given in the statement you have to choose the appropriate logical deduction for given statement.
Statement: Urban air pollution has reached alarming levels in several metropolitan cities, prompting governments to implement stricter vehicle emission standards. While electric vehicle adoption is increasing gradually, many consumers still hesitate due to concerns about charging infrastructure and higher upfront costs. Industrial emissions also contribute significantly to air quality deterioration, requiring comprehensive policy reforms beyond just transportation sector changes.
Conclusions:
I. Vehicle emissions are the primary cause of urban air pollution.
II. Electric vehicle adoption faces practical barriers despite environmental benefits.
III. Solving air pollution requires multi-sectoral policy interventions.
Which conclusion necessarily follows?
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: C
Explanation
I. The primary cause of urban air pollution is vehicular emissions.
This statement asserts that vehicles contribute to pollution, but it also notes that industries make significant contributions as well.
Therefore, it is not clear that vehicles are the *sole* primary cause.
Conclusion I does not follow.
II. Despite their environmental benefits, there are practical barriers to the adoption of electric vehicles.
This statement explicitly mentions that people hesitate due to concerns regarding charging infrastructure and high costs. This implies that there are practical difficulties involved in adopting electric vehicles.
Conclusion II follows.
III. Addressing air pollution requires multi-sectoral policy interventions.
This statement indicates that industrial emissions also contribute to the problem, and that policy reforms extending beyond the transport sector are necessary. Therefore, multiple sectors must work together.
Conclusion III follows.
Both II and III follow.
Option (3) is the correct answer.