Here some problem or solution of the problem is given in the statement you have to choose the appropriate logical deduction for given statement.
Statement:
Advancements in surveillance technology have improved national security and crime prevention. However, concerns about mass surveillance and privacy violations have sparked debates on ethical boundaries and government overreach. Critics demand transparent policies and public oversight.
Conclusions:
I. Surveillance technology has both benefits and risks.
II. Public oversight and clear policies are needed to balance privacy and security.
III. Surveillance should be completely banned to protect individual freedom.
Which conclusion necessarily follows?
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: B
Explanation
Conclusion I – Surveillance technology entails both benefits and risks.
This follows directly.
The statement explicitly mentions both the benefits (improved security) and the risks (privacy concerns).
Conclusion II – Public oversight and clear policies are necessary to maintain a balance between privacy and security.
This also follows.
Since critics demand transparent policies and oversight due to privacy concerns, it logically follows that such measures are required to strike a balance between security and privacy.
Conclusion III – A complete ban should be imposed on surveillance to protect individual liberty.
This does not follow.
The statement does not suggest imposing a ban on surveillance. It merely discusses the debate surrounding surveillance and the act of surveillance itself, not its complete elimination.
Therefore, Conclusions I and II follow.
Option (2) is the correct answer.