Despite being eligible for the job of a Legal Officer, Mr. X was not called for an interview for the aforementioned post. Which of his rights was Mr. X unable to exercise?
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: C
Explanation
The correct answer is option 3 i.e. Equality of opportunity.
Mr. X was unable to exercise his right to equality of opportunity in employment. This right, guaranteed under Article 16 of the Indian Constitution, ensures that all citizens have equal chances to apply for government jobs and are selected based on merit without discrimination. Despite being eligible for the position of Legal Officer, Mr. X was denied an interview, which violates this principle. Such discrimination undermines fairness and equal treatment in public employment, depriving qualified individuals of their rightful chance. Upholding equality of opportunity is essential for justice and maintaining trust in the recruitment process.